carefully worded

10 07 2007

There was a funeral in Detroit, Michigan yesterday: a big one. As hundreds of non-mourners looked on, the NAACP buried the n-word — once and for all.

Obviously, the burial was controversial among everyone — especially in the Black community. The symbolic motion had undertones of the Civil Rights-era passion that had been so widespread and successful in the 1950s and ’60s. Since then, Black Rights have been a less talked-about and more swept-under-the-rug topic of conversation for the country. Some see yesterday’s ceremony as a bold step to rekindle a movement many took for dead.

Except that the abolition of the n-word is tricky. The idea has a blatant air of censorship.

Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick said at the ceremony:

“To bury the N-word, we’ve got to bury the pimps and the hos and the hustlers. Let’s bury all the nonsense that comes with this.”

Whoa. We’ve got to “bury the pimps and the hos and the hustlers?” One problem: The pimps and the hos and the hustlers are not yet dead. Too often, those “pimps and hos and hustlers” are the ones who fall most victim to racist American society. These are the people who need our help. Wasn’t the idea of the NAACP to get America to learn to accept everyone, anyway? (Okay, that’s disputable, I’ll admit, but it’s a topic for another day).

Unfortunately, we can’t just bury these things. To me, this gesture more symbolizes the exact action that is behind institutionalized racism in this country than it does anything else: Our government’s desire to cover up its racist tendencies at every turn.

There are problems we have to acknowledge, here: For one, the overwhelming corporatization of hip-hop has masked what that music was really all about when it began. The glorification of drug-hustling and women-as-sex-objects (among other hip-hop cliches) not only gives white Americans the wrong idea about Black culture, it gives inner-city minority kids the wrong idea, too. But it sells, and people buy it. This music is just as much a part of our culture as anything else. An examination as to why this racial stereotype has become so acceptable is long overdue.

Furthermore, what right do we as white America have to define a culture as we deem acceptable? There is a growing movement in the Black community (especially gaining speed after the Michael Richards fiasco of last fall)  to reclaim the n-word, in an effort to invest in it respect and dignity. I need not add that many rappers subscribe to this idea.

In the end, words are not the problem. A symbolic burial is good to bring a community of like-minded people together, but that’s about where the positive nature of the action ends. More important is to address the problem at hand: there are millions of kids who are hearing that word on their friend’s MP3-players — but haven’t learned the history of it. That’s a problem. There are millions of Black teenagers who don’t know where to turn or what to do with their lives because this country has not given them the same resources as their white counterparts to make a living. Sometimes those people turn to selling drugs for money just to live their lives.  That’s a problem. White kids who do the same thing — less likely for lack of options and more likely for lack of initiative — are far less likely to be arrested for it. That’s a problem.

So it’s time for the NAACP to do something bigger, for once. I buried the n-word in my vocabulary a long time ago. When I was six, my mother explained to me what that word meant and that it would never be allowed under her roof. And I intend to do the same thing with my children, as I hope they will with theirs, so that the n-word might never disappear completely — a constant reminder of what we as a people did wrong, and the debt we will forever owe to those whose lives we destroyed.





mr. president

10 07 2007

President Bush’s announcement that he will speak tonight on the importance of staying the course in Iraq is no surprise. With ever-eroding support for the war, Bush looks a little like a kid with his hand caught in the (explosive?) cookie jar, trying to justify an error that continues to wreak inexplicacble amounts of havoc across the globe.

Too bad he’s making this ill-fated speech on the same day The Nation is publishing this brilliant article by Chris Hedges on the Web (for print on Thursday) about unheard-of atrocities in Iraq:

“And we were approaching this one house,” he said. “In this farming area, they’re, like, built up into little courtyards. So they have, like, the main house, common area. They have, like, a kitchen and then they have a storage shed-type deal. And we’re approaching, and they had a family dog. And it was barking ferociously, ’cause it’s doing its job. And my squad leader, just out of nowhere, just shoots it. And he didn’t–mother­fucker–he shot it and it went in the jaw and exited out. So I see this dog–I’m a huge animal lover; I love animals–and this dog has, like, these eyes on it and he’s running around spraying blood all over the place. And like, you know, What the hell is going on? The family is sitting right there, with three little children and a mom and a dad, horrified. And I’m at a loss for words. And so, I yell at him. I’m, like, What the fuck are you doing? And so the dog’s yelping. It’s crying out without a jaw. And I’m looking at the family, and they’re just, you know, dead scared. And so I told them, I was like, Fucking shoot it, you know? At least kill it, because that can’t be fixed….

“And–I actually get tears from just saying this right now, but–and I had tears then, too–and I’m looking at the kids and they are so scared. So I got the interpreter over with me and, you know, I get my wallet out and I gave them twenty bucks, because that’s what I had. And, you know, I had him give it to them and told them that I’m so sorry that asshole did that.”

-Spc. Philip Chrystal, 23, of Reno, on raiding one particular Iraqi civilian home.

The more-than-14,000-word article examines at length various inconsistencies, violent crimes, and horrific anecdotes as told by 50 veteran soldiers from Iraq. The interview process, which began last July, must have been extremely emotionally taxing, whereas the article itself is probably the single most disturbing and important piece to be published on the war to date.

John McCain,  ever the hawkish war-romantic, returned from a trip to Iraq this week having this to say about it:

 “I know that senators are tired of this war, tired of the mounting death toll, tired of the many mistakes we have made in this war and the great efforts it requires to reverse them, tired of the war’s politicization and the degree to which it has become embroiled in partisan struggles and election strategies… I understand this fatigue. And yet, I maintain that we, as elected leaders with a duty to our people and the security of their nation, cannot let fatigue dictate our policies.”

McCain is, as usual, way out of line. He is playing on the basic human need to be seen as strong and powerful — at the top of the pecking order. His rhetoric is reminiscent of a high school track coach: “I know you’re tired, but that exhausion is a manifestation of imagination. You’re gonna make us look like pussies if we lose to Benson AGAIN! Now MOVE!”

Except that this isn’t a game. We’re tired of reading pieces like Mr. Hedges’. We’re mentally, spiritually and physically exhausted.

And Bush seriously needs to let go of his stubborn pride. He continues to assert himself as the dictator of an ailing country, thirsty for new direction.